IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Management Research :
Corporate Social Responsibility Rating: India Focus
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has three major dimensions, namely, green practices, social welfare and ethical behavior. Fortunately, most CSR dimensions are measurable so as to facilitate CSR ratings in order to compare or highlight the different corporate sectors on a common platform. This paper at first charts the road map of evolution of India Inc. It has scanned particularly those companies who have crossed the various milestones of standard, namely, ISO 9000, ISO 14000, ISO 18000 and SA 8000, to satisfy quality, environmental trustworthiness, safety and social accountability, respectively. Next, the research investigates the role, the background framework and the potentiality of CSR ratings obtained from Karmayog.com platform that may act as suitable means to drive the industry further up the ladder of social responsibility. Tata Steel (TSE) has been found to be the best example, especially for Small and Medium Industries (SMEs) to follow, since CSR reporting may soon become mandatory for India Inc. as required by the Government of India. This paper culminates with the identification of the pivotal role of educational wings like Tata Institute of Social Sciences to extend the CSR journey further up to the breeding ground of future corporate citizens and in that spirit, the paper finally paints the current and future CSR picture of Eastern Institute of Integrated Learning in Management (EIILM) B-School at Kolkata.

 
 

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), also called corporate responsibility, corporate citizenship, responsible business and corporate social opportunity, is a concept whereby organizations consider the interests of the society by taking responsibility for the impact of their activities on customers, suppliers, employees, shareholders, communities and other stakeholders, as well as the environment. It encompasses charitable activities in the field of healthcare, different forms of health camps, voluntary blood donation, education of the underprivileged, welfare of the physically challenged, organic farming, livelihood programs, alternate fuel – Jatropha plantation, slum rehabilitation, disaster management, etc., and also deals with sensitive issues like child labor, girl child, road safety, women wellness, minority development and even promotes the local club.

The practice of CSR is, however, subject to much debate and criticism. Proponents argue that there is a strong business case for CSR—corporations benefit in multiple ways by operating with a perspective on broader and longer than their own immediate, short-term profits, which range from reduced regulatory intervention and reduced costs by employee volunteering to the identification of new products and new market, increased sales, staff motivation and customer loyalty, all leading to a more sustainable business. Critics, however, argue that CSR distracts one from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is just window-dressing and that it is an attempt to preempt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful multinational corporations.

 
 

Management Research Journal, Multinational Companies, Indian Pharmaceutical Sector, Financial Management, Working Capital Management, Public Sector Enterprises, Inventory Management, Credit Management, Multinational Private Sector Companies, Multiple Regression Techniques, Pharmaceutical Companies.